Fox Lies! The bottom 50% pay their fair share.

We have all heard this if we listen to any of the Republicans running for office – the bottom 50% pay nothing into the treasury in  income taxes and are essentially moochers, while the richest 1% pay somewhere in the range of 37% to 40% of all income taxes in this country .

I get so tired of hearing Sean Hannity ask how much is enough to take from rich people.

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Grover Norquist, and every republican who either thinks like Michele Bachmann or is afraid that someone who does think like her will challenge them in a primary if they do not toe the line drawn by Roger Ailes (the president of Fox News), say it is not right to tax the rich more until everyone pays something, that this country was not set up for half of the citizenry to be moochers and cannot continue unless this is changed.

As someone said – Twain, Disraeli, Carlyle or someone, anyone else -“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”

And trying to dig out the truth or falsity of this assertion will make your head hurt.  It did mine, and I am used to working with numbers. I will try to demonstrate the fallacy of the Fox/Republican assertion without causing too much ear-bleeding.

Fox is factual, but not fair

The first lie, upon which this assertion is based, is not a lie of commission, but one of omission, of the thing magicians do when they want you not to see what it is they are doing.  It is called misdirection.

A couple of facts:

  • The top 1%, with incomes in excess of about $340,000, have about 30% of all income and pay about 37% of all income taxes.
  • The bottom 50%, with income under about $26,000, have about 13% of all income and pay almost nothing – 2% in 2009.

So, Fox is right.  On this narrow issue, which they trick many of us into believing is the whole fair and balanced truth, they are factual.

Ears bleeding yet?  Just wait.

 

Now for the rest of the story (as Paul Harvey would say)

Contrary to what Al Gore said, there is no ‘Lockbox” or “Trust Fund.” Social Security is a part of the total federal budget income and outlays. Total revenues are about $2.3 trillion dollars, of which only about $1.1 trillion is from personal income taxes (sheesh – using the word “only” to describe trillions of dollars, but so it is). About $800 Billion is from social security taxes. Together, they make up more than 83% of total federal income – the balance being corporate income taxes (about 8%), with excise and other taxes making up the difference.

The Social Security tax is paid on only (there’s that word again in an odd place) the first $106,000 of income – after that, none is paid, so, not only do the 1% have a lot more income, they get a tax break once their annual incomes exceed $106.000 – over three times the 50% line.

The Social Security tax is comprised of the FICA tax and Medicare tax, half of which is deducted from the employee’s paycheck and the other half is paid by the employer. The FICA parts are 4.2% from the employee (with the reduction put in place last year) and 6.2% from the employer, for a total of 10.4%.  The Medicare is 1.45% from each, for a total of 2.9%.  All in, this is 13.3% of wages.

I consider the employer’s portion to be a cost of employing people and as such, a part that employee’s total cost of employment and credit the whole 13.3% to the employee, because without the employee, no tax would be due and in theory, if it were to go away, all employers would immediately raise the salary of every employee for their share of the payroll tax.  Yeah, and – well, fill in your own metaphor. . .

When all the number crunching is done, the top 1% on average pay about one percent of their total income in Social Security taxes.  For Medicare, there is no limit on the tax for earned income, but a lot of income of the 1% is so-called unearned income – interest, dividends, and capital gains.

It is the earned income in excess of $106,000 and the unearned income which caused Warren Buffet to write his op-ed piece in which he said Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent.

This goes back to St. Reagan, who supported higher taxes on corporations. Defending his tax reform proposal in 1985, Reagan said:

We’re going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that have allowed some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that’s crazy. It’s time we stopped it….

What we’re trying to move against is institutionalized unfairness. We want to see that everyone pays their fair share, and no one gets a free ride. Our reasons? It’s good for society when we all know that no one is manipulating the system to their advantage because they’re rich and powerful. But it’s also good for society when everyone pays something, that everyone makes a contribution.

See Reagan’s comments

The  real story

When all the numbers are crunched and social security receipts are figured in, the top 1%, with 30% of total income pay about 22.8% of the total federal taxes collected while the bottom 50%, with about 13% of total income pay, are you ready for this?, about 13% of total federal taxes. Essentially their fair share.

This is, as they say, inconvenient for Fox and their Republican friends and is too mind-numbing to be talked about by any of the Democrats, so, unless we can and are willing to do the math, what we hear is the factual lie about this from the right wing and believe that fairness requires raising taxes on the bottom 50%.

Makes sense, I guess.


Sources:

Personal incomestatistics

Government revenues

2 thoughts on “Fox Lies! The bottom 50% pay their fair share.

  1. Why do people who work at Target or Wal-Mart and earn 20K pay into the system $1800 and get a tax refund of $5 or $6 thousand. How is that fair? The top 20% of wage earners pay 80% of the income tax. What percent would you like them to pay? 90% 100%? Please stop the tomfoolery. The problem is spending. You could confiscate all the income from everyone earning $100,000 and up and you would have enough money to run the government for 60 days. When you government borrows $50,000 a second just to keep running you have a spending problem.

  2. Three clarifications.
    1. Wayne is talking about the earned income credit – available only when there are qualifying children in the home – but, based on the 2010 rules, he would have gotten almost $10,000. Fair or not, well, that is the issue.

    2. Households with incomes greater than $100,000 in 2010 had approximately $4 Trillion in income, which was about one year of total federal spending.

    3. Wayne cites the percentage of income taxes paid by the top. The important thing to know is that income taxes comprise about 40% of total tax collections. Corporate taxes are about 8%, social security taxes about 43%. The rest is excise taxes and other fees. Those who want to cut taxes on the top earners like to cite the percentage of INCOME taxes paid by the top. But they pay almost none of the social security tax, which is paid by everybody else.

    The problem is both revenue deficiencies and spending excesses. Historically, both revenues and spending have been around 19 – 21 % of Gross Domestic Product. Now, revenue is less than 15% of GDP and spending is above 24%, Revenue needs to go up and spending needs to go down. Otherwise, the fedral debt will exceed $20 Trillion before 2020.

    Without an increase is revenues, balancing the budget is impossible because total social security, defense and medicare exceed revenues, unless those programs are cut.

    Big problems. Do we have the people in office who can do it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s